B&TB&TB&T
  • Advertising
  • Marketing
  • Media
Search
  • Advertising
  • Marketing
  • Media
  • Technology
  • TV Ratings
  • Opinion
  • Campaigns
  • Partner content
  • Sports Marketing
  • B&T Podcast
  • B&T TV Episodes
  • Subscribe
  • About B&T
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with us
  • B&T’s 30 Under 30 Awards
  • Women leading Tech Awards
  • Cairns Crocodiles
  • B&T’s Women in Media Awards
  • B&T Awards
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Advertise with us
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2024 B&T. The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd.
Reading: Why Australia’s New Data Retention Laws Are Stupid And Don’t Work Anyway
Share
Subscribe
Sign In
B&TB&T
Search
  • Advertising
  • Marketing
  • Media
  • Technology
  • TV Ratings
  • Opinion
  • Campaigns
  • Partner content
  • Sports Marketing
  • B&T Podcast
  • B&T TV Episodes
  • About B&T
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with us
  • B&T’s 30 Under 30 Awards
  • Women leading Tech Awards
  • Cannes in Cairns
  • B&T’s Women in Media Awards
  • B&T Awards
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Advertise with us
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2024 B&T. The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd.
B&T > Opinion > Why Australia’s New Data Retention Laws Are Stupid And Don’t Work Anyway
OpinionTechnology

Why Australia’s New Data Retention Laws Are Stupid And Don’t Work Anyway

Staff Writers
Published on: 19th October 2015 at 9:45 AM
Staff Writers
Share
5 Min Read
SHARE

Editor of B&T’s sister business site Which-50.com Andrew Birmingham is no fan of Australia’s new data laws that came into force last week. And, here’s his tips if you want to circumvent them anyway…

Australia’s new data retention regime came into force this month and there’s plenty to ridicule. If you put your trousers on left leg first, the laws are dangerous and ill considered. If you butter your croissants right handed you should be outraged that the rules will cost a fortune to administer and are so incompetently drafted that they won’t work.

In response, the Twitterati have spoken, “Australia, you’re drunk. And stupid. Go home.”

Each week Which-50 and KINSHIP digital track Australia’s top retweets and on those rare occasions when Justin Bieber and Five Sounds of Summer don’t sweep the field, we reveal the best non boy-band related subjects dominating the Twittersphere.

Edward Snowden posted Australia’s most shared tweet this week noting, “Beginning today, if you are Australian, everything you do online is being tracked, stored, and retained for two years.”

Snowden, the whistle blower who spans the full hero/traitor dichotomy depending on your own personal bias (Which-50 prefers the former characterisation to the latter) tweeted a link to a Getup page criticizing Australia’s new – and demonstrably ludicrous data retention – laws.

Some description

The stupidity, absurdity and ineptitude of the retention laws are laid bare by the simple expedient of demonstrating how easy they are to circumvent.

Ssshhhh no one tell the terrorists… or the Daily Telegraph!

For those of you worried that Malcolm Turnbull might be tracking your perfectly understandable and appropriate One Direction infatuation here’s the skinny from Getup on how to keep ASIO out of your Harry Styles Meta Data dump.

  • Use public Wi-Fi hotspots, which aren’t covered by the data retention scheme. For example, use the Wi-Fi provided at a council hotspot, library, university (or Parliament House!)
  • Use a foreign-operated messaging service (which most messaging services are), such as Google chat, Twitter direct messages, Facebook messenger or Whatsapp.  NB: Intelligence agencies will still be able to see if you are using these services, but Australia’s data retention scheme won’t be able to tell who you’re messaging. (Also be mindful that the good folk at the NSA will still be able to see this.)
  • Use a foreign-operated email service, such as Gmail or Hotmail (which many Australians already do). Again, intelligence agencies will still be able to see if you are using these services, but Australia’s data retention scheme won’t be able to tell who you’re emailing. That being said, if you are emailing someone who uses an Australian-based email service, they will have access to their metadata – i.e. know you emailed them. (And again, be mindful that the good folk at the NSA will be able to see this.)

In fact this is just the easy stuff. Getup provides a list of additional tools for those of you who want to go seriously dark and keep your embarrassing personal musical tastes and personality foibles out of the incorruptable hands of our public (and private) entities.

Some description

(Image: Nobody tell ASIO)

In the subsequent Tweet conversation there is also a link to a blog by Robin Doherty called “Your digital privacy ends this time next week” which contains a more extensive discussion about the kinds of data being retained.

Doherty reveals that “About 2500 people can access the data, without warrant. The same people can authorise access for others, without warrant.”

And he helpfully lists the agencies authorised to access this information without a warrant (we added the links, just to give you some peace of mind that your metadata is in safe hands):

  • ASIO (Australian Security Intelligence Organisation)
  • Australian Border Force
  • Australian Federal Police
  • All state and territory police forces
  • The Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity
  • Australian Crime Commission
  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission
  • Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
  • NSW Crime Commission
  • NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption
  • NSW Police Integrity Commission
  • Queensland Crime and Corruption Commission
  • West Australian Corruption and Crime Commission
  • South Australian Independent Commission Against Corruption
  • Any other agency (public or private) the Attorney General publicly declares

So basically, anybody at all.

The eight of the next nine most popular retweets involve pretty musicians who sound great once their voices are synthesized, while the list of the ten most retweeted tweets was rounded out with an EA Sport’s FIFA promo.

 

No related posts.

TAGGED: audited, Designworks, einsights
Staff Writers 20/10/2015 19/10/2015
Share
Staff Writers
By Staff Writers
Follow:
Staff Writers represent B&T's team of award-winning reporters. Here, you'll find articles crafted with industry experience spanning over 50 years. Our team of specialists brings together a wealth of knowledge and a commitment to delivering insightful, topical, and breaking news. With a deep understanding of advertising and media, our Staff Writers are dedicated to providing industry-leading analysis and reporting, both shaping the conversation and setting the benchmark for excellence.

Latest News

B&T’s Agency Scorecard: Leo Burnett
11/09/2024
B&T’s Agency Scorecard: TBWA
11/09/2024
Special claims the Grand Prix at the 2023 B&T Awards!
Hear Ye! Hear Ye! B&T Awards 2024 Finalists Have Been Revealed!
11/09/2024
Philippa Noilea-Tani, chief investment & operations officer, Wavemaker.
Wavemaker Appoints Philippa Noilea-Tani To Chief Investment & Operations Officer
11/09/2024
//

B&T is Australia’s leading news publication magazine for the advertising, marketing, media and PR industries.

 

B&T is owned by parent company The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd.

About B&T

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Advertise with us
  • Terms & Conditions

Top Categories

  • Advertising
  • Campaigns
  • Marketing
  • Media
  • Opinion
  • Technology
  • TV Ratings

Sign Up for Our Newsletter



B&TB&T
Follow US
© 2024 B&T. The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Register Lost your password?